Skip to end of metadata
Go to start of metadata

You are viewing an old version of this content. View the current version.

Compare with Current View Version History

« Previous Version 5 Next »

\uD83D\uDDD3 Date

\uD83D\uDC65 Participants

\uD83E\uDD45 Goals

  • Follow up on Felicity’s review of the voucher table and investigate whether we can get an URI for each of the determined voucher

  • Lifespan addition through all plants FOIs?

  • Associate dominance definition

    • Definition for association dominance categories (it seems to be within the context of the community, e.g. which plant are on the overstorey of the community)

  • What to do with fungi (e.g. Cortinaria in suovemeasure)

  • Review of suupstorey table (plant species in understorey stratum?)

    • what is upstoreyseqnr number

    • what other tables or variables should be joined?

  • Review of overstorey tables

    • relationship between suovemeasure (plant spp within a stratum?) and suoverstorey (the average of the stratum?)

    • suovemeasure

      • check if all columns that need to be present are present

      • Concepts. plant height concept (is it relative to the ground or relative to the absolute plant height, e.g. orchid on a tree)

      • Definitions and units for "OSTOREYHEIGHT", "CROWNDEPTH", "CANOPYDIAM","CANOPYGAP".

      • Units seem to be a combination of centimeters and meters. This seems to propagate through to suoverstorey: eg see grasses (Graminods) have a range of heights (0.013- 28) overlapping with Myrtaceae (0.08 - 16)

        • This information propagates to suoverstorey for example see sv."VISITNR" = 6194 in suoverstorey

  • Review of plant community table

    • what is suvisage class? Is it done at the site level? there seems to be up to 6 per site visit

    • Missing vocabs for lstr."STRLIFEFORMNR" ,lstr."PROJFOLCOVERNR and "DOMINSPCODE”

  • Other questions

    • Dropping OSTOREYSPECHTNR, SHRUBSPECHTNR,GROUNDSPECHTNR in suvisit table? This values are mostly empty (> 99% cells missing)

    • suplantassembly table seems to not contain much information, are there other observations from other tables that should completement the information on this table?

\uD83D\uDDE3 Discussion topics

Time

Item

Presenter

Notes





✅ Action items

  •  

⤴ Decisions

  • No labels