...
Source Column | Destination RDF Predicate | Comments | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||
|
| Domain: Range: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
Tina: Not useful. A boolean to tell if photos exist for the plot site. May be useful to have in the future. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Tina: Not useful. LAI is useful for some analyses work. May be useful to have in the future but the data is not currently recorded in the database. It is in Excel spreadsheets in TERN AusPlots Adelaide. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Tina: Not useful. Need to confirm if this is useful or not. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| Member of
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| Member of
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| Member of
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| Member of
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| Member of
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| Member of
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| Member of
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
| Member of
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Domain: Range:
Looks like this is the value of who the observer was for the collected vegetation data. Do we need to collect the observer information? We didn’t for CORVEG. Tina: Double check with Guru if we capture this. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Domain: Range:
Looks like this is the value of who the observer was for the collected soil data. Do we need to collect the observer information? We didn’t for CORVEG. Tina: Double check with Guru if we capture this. | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Looks like this is the value of who the observer was that described something. Do we need to collect the observer information? We didn’t for CORVEG. Tina: Double check with Guru if we capture this. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Not captured by TERN Plot Ontology. Value is a text. Example: 3TEIOAOARBHKK-, 3CACQCZCPAGLLU, NC, etc. Is it some kind of code? The serial number of the instrument used? What is This is the Australian Soil Classification. May not be useful as quoted by Emrys and Andrew. See page 225 of the Yellow Book for the codes. The values here also contain numbers, which I have no idea what it is. Andrew didn’t know how the codes were formulated. Data is no longer recorded since 2013. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Model the pit markers as part of a sub-site to the main plot site. The pit markers are to be converted from UTM to lat/long as This is the pit markers for the soil pit outside the main plot site used for soil characterisation. This is required. The soil pit is outside of the main plot site because they do not want to dig a massive whole inside the actual site. This is created to collect soil characterisations such as soil chemistry, etc. Modelled as sub-site with Location (Converted to lat/long) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Modelled as sub-site with Location (Converted to lat/long) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Modelled as sub-site with Location (Converted to lat/long) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Modelled as sub-site with Location (Comment in subsite) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Modelled as sub-site with Location (Comment in subsite) | |||||||||||||||||||
| Member of
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Not captured by TERN Plot Ontology. We only check the value of this and capture any records that are | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
Member of
ssn-ext:ObservationCollection with dct:type Site?
| The site’s photo name. Assuming it is uniqueNot captured by TERN Plot Ontology. The site’s photo name. We already have the table ‘photographs’ that records the filename as the SITE_NAME. This is following the AEKOS procedure with images and filenames. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Add to comment. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Add to comment. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Add to comment. | |||||||||||||||||||
| Add to comment. |
...