Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

There are at least three gridded surface climatic climate datasets available in Australia, they differ by the interpolation method. They all operate from the BOM network of weather stations

...

for Australia. They each use the same underlying BOM weather station data (albeit with possibly different quality controls applied). They differ in the interpolation method used and the variables provided.

Name

Sources

BOM Australian Gridded Climate Data (AGCD)

...

  • Sometimes also refered to as “BAWAP”

SILO - Queensland Government Data

...

...

Users are encourage to explore the details of each to help choose the dataset best suited to their requirements. Here are some articles that compare the datasets:

  • Beesley, C. A., A. J. Frost and J. Zajaczkowski. (2009). A comparison of the BAWAP and SILO spatially interpolated daily rainfall datasets. MODSIM Congress, Cairns, Australia 13-17 July 2009. https://www.mssanz.org.au/modsim09/I13/beesley.pdf

  • Tozer, C. R., Kiem, A. S., & Verdon-Kidd, D. C. (2012). On the uncertainties associated with using gridded rainfall data as a proxy 697 for observed. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 16(5), 1481. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1481-2012

  • Chubb Thomas H. , Manton Michael J. , Siems Steven T. Peace Andrew D. (2016). Evaluation of the AWAP daily precipitation spatial analysis with an independent gauge network in the Snowy Mountains. Journal of Southern Hemisphere Earth Systems Science 66, 55-67. https://doi.org/10.1071/ES16006

  • Fu, G., Barron, O., Charles, S.P. et al. (2022). Uncertainty of Gridded Precipitation at Local and Continent Scales: A Direct Comparison of Rainfall from SILO and AWAP in Australia. Asia-Pacific J Atmos Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13143-022-00267-4